tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post115826902742656008..comments2024-03-25T07:51:47.758-04:00Comments on Thoughts On Economics: Sraffa or Marx?Robert Vienneauhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14748118392842775431noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-1158713956075781102006-09-19T20:59:00.000-04:002006-09-19T20:59:00.000-04:00I have found some in the literature treating the l...I have found some in the literature treating the labor theory of value as related to aggregation issues. Michio Morishima, in his mid seventies study of Marx, had some sort of claim that commodities could be aggregated if the processes used to produce them had the same organic composition of capital. And check out the Sraffa quote (from his unpublished notes) at the end of <A HREF="http://www.dreamscape.com/rvien/Economics/Essays/sraffa.html" REL="nofollow">this essay of mine</A>.Robert Vienneauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14748118392842775431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-1158652354497258892006-09-19T03:52:00.000-04:002006-09-19T03:52:00.000-04:00I've always taken the view that the transformation...I've always taken the view that the transformation problem is the equivalent in Marxian (and classical) economics of the capital controversies in neoclassical economics; a genuine antinomy that demonstrates the problems in the system. AFAICS, the CCC shows that neoclassical economics is a disaggregated system that can't be aggregated properly and the TP shows that Marxian/classical economics is an aggregated system that can't be disaggregated properly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com