Thoughts On Economics

Monday, March 31, 2008

Comity?

›
Mike Beggs writes : "I've thought for quite a while that mainstream economics is supported by an exoskeleton of empiricism rather t...
40 comments:
Saturday, March 29, 2008

Samuelson Versus Sraffians, Recently

›
I've previously pointed out some of Samuelson's acknowledgements of the Cambridge Capital Controversy. Some of Samuelson's co...
3 comments:
Monday, March 24, 2008

A Reader Of Mirowski And Georgescu-Roegen?

›
I don't think I have previously read Robert Nadeau. I know I haven't read this book . But I find his editorial in this month's ...
11 comments:
Friday, March 21, 2008

Notre Dame over George Mason

›
Although both are heterodox, I prefer one of the economics departments at Notre Dame to the George Mason economics department anyway.
3 comments:
Thursday, March 13, 2008

Against Supply And Demand

›
1.0 Introduction (I will not be blogging for maybe a week after maybe tomorrow.) The dominant economic theories during the classical period ...
7 comments:
Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Typical Mirowski?

›
"Concerning the [Induced Value Theory], it should be noted that in principle reward structures can be employed so as to generate any ...
Monday, March 10, 2008

Marxists Against Sraffians

›
It's been years since I read these references: Frank Roosevelt (1975). "Cambridge Economics as Commodity Fetishism", Review of...
4 comments:
Sunday, March 09, 2008

Neoclassical Economics as Imitation Physics

›
I cannot recall any literature that develops this point: "One interesting sidelight before we leave the subject of intertemporal pricin...
2 comments:
Thursday, March 06, 2008

Meme Response

›
It took me a while to notice this tag : Pick up the nearest book (of at least 123 pages). Open the book to page 123. Find the fifth sentence...
3 comments:
Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Why Isn't "New Keynesianism" Called "New Pigouvianism"?

›
Axel Leijonhufvud had at least this part right decades ago: "That a model with wage rigidity as its main distinguishing feature should ...
4 comments:
Monday, March 03, 2008

Goodbye to "Rational Expectations"

›
Consider an economic model in which the agents within the model act on decisions based on their understanding of the model. For ease of expo...
4 comments:
Sunday, March 02, 2008

I Reject A Fact

›
Many firms nowadays find their value is embodied in ideas, processes, algorithms, genetic information, etc. Artifacts expressing knowledge c...
1 comment:
Wednesday, February 27, 2008

I Stared At This For A Good Five Minutes

›
Referee Report on "Some Capital-Theoretic Fallacies of Austrian Economics" January 2008 Summary: This paper challenges some of th...
4 comments:
Sunday, February 24, 2008

Wittgenstein to Sraffa

›
The March 2008 issue of Harper's Magazine reports that a new edition of Wittgenstein's letters in Cambridge is being published by ...
3 comments:
Monday, February 18, 2008

Capitalism Advocates Undressed

›
I find this amusing. I suppose I should be grateful that somebody with a more popular blog than mine cites me.
2 comments:
Sunday, February 17, 2008

Jesse Larner On Friedrich Hayek

›
I bought the Winter 2008 edition of Dissent just to read Jesse Larner's article, "Who's Afraid of Friedrich Hayek?". This...
3 comments:
Saturday, February 16, 2008

Marginalism As A Reaction To Marxism

›
I should be able to find older citations and by non-Sraffians for this thesis. Nikolai Bukharin would be good to reread, or at least rebrows...
2 comments:
Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Reaction to Rodrik

›
Thomas Palley has been reading Rodrik's book, One Economics, Many Recipes . Pallay's reaction is better expressed and better though...
Monday, February 11, 2008

Pasinetti's Principles

›
Luigi Pasinetti, in his new book, Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A "Revolution in Economics" to be Accomplished , summarizes...
6 comments:
Sunday, February 10, 2008

Time that with this strange excuse Pardoned Kipling and his views

›
There was a certain political tendency in the United States around 1900. Historians call it the Progressive movement. I think it interesting...
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.