tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post4117664734201141803..comments2024-03-25T07:51:47.758-04:00Comments on Thoughts On Economics: Simple and Expanded ReproductionRobert Vienneauhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14748118392842775431noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-83306293300707858182007-12-13T01:07:00.000-05:002007-12-13T01:07:00.000-05:00Hey Robert,After commenting I followed the links i...Hey Robert,<BR/><BR/>After commenting I followed the links in the post and discovered you're an old hand at this... my references are redundant, sorry! I'll check out those references, cheers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-24516351939217357912007-12-12T07:34:00.000-05:002007-12-12T07:34:00.000-05:00I'm not thinking of developing this further. I wan...I'm not thinking of developing this further. I wanted to present an exposition illustrating my <A HREF="http://robertvienneau.blogspot.com/2007/10/liberal-anti-marxism-annoying.html" REL="nofollow">claim</A> that Marx provides tools for the analysis of capitalist societies.<BR/><BR/>I agree Kaldor did work that fits in with the model in my post.<BR/><BR/>I think it is challenging to fit money into this framework. I don't think I can give you good advice. The New School certainly has researchers to look at. You might find Jan Kregel's "Hamlet with the Prince" (<I>American Economic Review</I>, May 1985) article of interest. Also, see the work of economists known as circuitists.Robert Vienneauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14748118392842775431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-19569537513051667972007-12-10T23:08:00.000-05:002007-12-10T23:08:00.000-05:00oops - should read "inflation and anti-inflation p...oops - should read "inflation and anti-inflation policy"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-7254532716341074192007-12-10T23:07:00.000-05:002007-12-10T23:07:00.000-05:00Hey Robert,Don't have time to engage properly, but...Hey Robert,<BR/>Don't have time to engage properly, but just wanted to say, good stuff. I've been reading postwar growth theory stuff for my thesis so on the same wavelength. Like you say this can go in many directions... where are you thinking?<BR/><BR/>My thesis is on inflation and anti-policy so I'm most interested in what growth theory says about those things. Since the 1950s or 1960s growth and inflation have been in different theoretical compartments. But it's interesting to me that the early burst of Keynesian growth theory was concerned with inflation.<BR/><BR/>From here, I'm interested in where you might go in introducing money and the price level, and in bringing in government. Both being Keynesian developments missing from Marx (his reproduction schema at least) but important.<BR/><BR/>Speaking of Kaldor in the last comment thread, I notice he's not in your refs here... but his stuff is really interesting, similar to Joan Robinson. Check out his two-part lecture in 1959 Economica. Also you might be interested in recent stuff by Anwar Shaikh synthesising Marxian/classical and Keynesian growth and cycle theory. At his website: http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/<BR/><BR/>Mike Beggs<BR/>scandalum.wordpress.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com