tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post6346243507583945296..comments2024-03-25T07:51:47.758-04:00Comments on Thoughts On Economics: On Arguments Not Of A Logical TypeRobert Vienneauhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14748118392842775431noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-77390413907168488212008-01-18T05:12:00.000-05:002008-01-18T05:12:00.000-05:00I've listed some reviews of Keen's book.I've <A HREF="http://robertvienneau.blogspot.com/2006/10/reviews-of-keens-debunking-economics.html" REL="nofollow">listed</A> some reviews of Keen's book.Robert Vienneauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14748118392842775431noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-24509501177586248522008-01-17T17:10:00.000-05:002008-01-17T17:10:00.000-05:00I read Steve Keen's Debunking EconomicsIn my opini...I read Steve Keen's Debunking Economics<BR/><BR/>In my opinion, he made some very interesting notions about neoclassic economics.<BR/><BR/>However, I tried to search for neoclassic scholars' responses to the critique Keen made, but couldn't find anything sensible.<BR/><BR/>Could you recommend some literature or reviews etc?<BR/><BR/>Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-1826029473352694692008-01-08T09:58:00.000-05:002008-01-08T09:58:00.000-05:00I think "penetration of mainstream economics" is b...I think "penetration of mainstream economics" is best understood by looking at what mainstream economists teach, rather than the list of topics addressed in their research publications.<BR/><BR/>So here's the question. Even an outsider like myself can be see that Samuelson has been influential in shaping undergraduate pedagogy. So is there anything of his "heterodox" ruminations to be seen in his undergraduate texts?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-5751837041314013992008-01-08T04:24:00.000-05:002008-01-08T04:24:00.000-05:00So when Paul Samuelson admitted that Robinson and ...So when Paul Samuelson admitted that Robinson and Sraffa were right, he was not really the leading exponent of mainstream neo-classical thought?<BR/><BR/>I suppose it is very convenient for neo-classicalists to believe what Samuelson believed has nothing to do with mainstream neo-classical economics...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26706564.post-67263550952137420552008-01-07T17:38:00.000-05:002008-01-07T17:38:00.000-05:00It's very convenient for post-Keynesians to believ...It's very convenient for post-Keynesians to believe that mainstream-ers believe what's convenient.Gabriel Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18020403326536585795noreply@blogger.com