Reviews of Keen's Debunking Economics

I read some reviews as negative and some as positive. The negative reviews include both those who think neoclassical economics is basically inconsistent and incoherent (but think Keen fails to point out the errors well enough) and those who think otherwise. By the way, I argued with Keen about his presentation of the SMD theory before publication, even though I had never heard the label "Gorman form" then.

• Balak, Benjamin (2005). Eastern Economic Journal: 148-150
• Belenkiy, Ari (2005). Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, V. 56: 129-139
• Laibman, David (2003). Review of Radical Political Economics (Summer): 351-353
• Misina, Miroslav (2005). Economic Journal (November): F419-F422
• Murphy, Robert P. and Gene Callaham (2003). Review of Austrian Economics, V. 16, N. 4: 381-384
• Myatt, Anthony(2004). Journal of Economic Education (Winter): 100-103
• Nesiba, Reynold F. (2006). Review of Radical Political Economics (Winter): 154-157
• Oleson, Ted (2003). Journal of Economic Issues: 228-231
• Quiggin, John (2002). (?): 233-235
• Whalen, Charles J. (2004). (?): 255-257