Catalog Of Neoclassical Responses To The Cambridge Capital Controversy

This is merely a list and, as usual, off the top of my head.

• Paul A. Samuelson (1966). A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568-583.
• Mark Blaug (1975). The Cambridge revolution: Success of failure? A critical analysis of Cambridge theories of value and distribution. Institute of Economic Affairs.
• Joseph E. Stiglitz (1974). The Cambridge-Cambridge controversy on the theory of capital: A view from New Haven.
• Christopher J. Bliss (1975). Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Elsevier North-Holland.
• Avinash Dixit (1977). The accumulation of capital theory. Oxford Economic Papers 29: 1-29.
• Edwin Burmeister (1980). Capital Theory and Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.
• Frank Hahn (1982). The neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353-374.
• Andreu Mas Colell (1989). Capital theory paradoxes: Anything goes. In Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory (ed. by G. R. Feiwel), Macmillan.
• Mario Ferretti (2004). The neo-Ricardian critique: An anniversary assessment.
• Gaetano Bloise and Pietro Reichlin (2005). An obtrusive remark on capital and comparative statics.
• Michael Mandler (). Sraffian economics (new developments). In New Palgrave, 2nd edition.

I could have cited many more references from Burmeister, Mandler, or Samuelson. I do not know if the last two were published as anything more than working papers. As far as I am concerned, most mainstream economists also ignore the neoclassical side of the CCC.