My next problem might be to explore how to apply an analysis of the orders of efficiency and rentability to a model of rent with multiple agricultural commodities. I would like the possibility of both extensive and intensive rent. This post outlines the structure of a simople numeric example. I have not written down the price systems for each technique. I need to do that to be sure Table 2 is correct.
I should prioritize submitting an article with my most recent model of rent. I should also work through examples in the problems for the approriate chapter in Kurz and Salvadori (1995). As I understand it, nobody has investigated the orders of efficiency and rentability in a model like this. I think Kurz and Salvadori have an existence proof in a special case of joint production, different from the special case I would develop.
Table 1 shows the structure of the technology I am thinking of investigating. Each agricultural commodity can be produced by two processes. The processes differ in which of the two types of land they are operated on, as well as in other coefficients of production.
| Inputs | Industries | ||||
| Iron | Wheat | Rye | |||
| I | II | III | IV | V | |
| Labor | a0,1 | a0,2 | a0,3 | a0,4 | a0,5 |
| Type 1 Land | 0 | c1,2 | 0 | c1,4 | 0 |
| Type 2 Land | 0 | 0 | c2,3 | 0 | c2,5 |
| Iron | a1,1 | a1,2 | a1,3 | a1,4 | a1,5 |
| Wheat | a2,1 | a2,2 | a2,3 | a2,4 | a2,5 |
| Rye | a3,1 | a3,2 | a3,3 | a3,4 | a3,5 |
| OUPUTS | 1 ton iron | 1 bushel wheat | 1 bushel wheat | 1 bushel rye | 1 bushel rye |
Table 3 lists the techniques of production.
- Alpha, Epsilon, and Zeta have the same solving subsystem. Epsilon and Zeta pay extensive rent on type 2 land.
- Delta, Eta, and Theta have the same solving subsystem. Eta and Theta pay extensive rent on type 1 land.
- Iota pays intensive rent on type 1 land. The solving subsystem has joint production.
- Kappa pays intensive rent on type 1 land. The solving subsystem has joint production.
- Lambda pays intensive rent on type 2 land. The solving subsystem has joint production.
- Mu pays intensive rent on type 2 land. The solving subsystem has joint production.
- Nu pays intensive rent on both types of land. The solving subsystem has joint production.
I do not seem to have a technique that pays both extensive and intensive rent. If type 1 land were fully farmed under Epsilon, would the price system not be overdetermined?
| Name | Processes | Type 1 Land | Type 2 Land |
| Alpha | I, II, IV | Partially Farmed | Fallow |
| Beta | I, II, V | Partially Farmed | Partially Farmed |
| Gamma | I, III, IV | Partially Farmed | Partially Farmed |
| Delta | I, III, V | Fallow | Partially Farmed |
| Epsilon | I, II, III, IV | Partially Farmed | Fully Farmed |
| Zeta | I, II, IV, V | Partially Farmed | Fully Farmed |
| Eta | I, II, III, V | Fully Farmed | Partially Farmed |
| Theta | I, III, IV, V | Fully Farmed | Partially Farmed |
| Iota | I, II, III, IV | Fully Farmed | Partially Farmed |
| Kappa | I, II, IV, V | Fully Farmed | Partially Farmed |
| Lambda | I, II, III, V | Partially Farmed | Fully Farmed |
| Mu | I, III, IV, V | Partially Farmed | Fully Farmed |
| Nu | I, II, III, IV, V | Fully Farmed | Fully Farmed |
Anyways, this post presents some thoughts about future research I might explore.
