The Cambridge Capital Controversy has other implications for applications. In particular, one should be sceptical about the Solovian framework for measuring Total Factor Productivity (TFP). One might ask how one should analyze national accounts at an aggregate level instead. I have read very little of his work, but Thomas K. Rymes has pursued a research program directed at that question. He is also apparently interested in the Post Keynesian theory of endogenous money. I provide a list of some of his papers, most of which I recently downloaded. I don't have access to the book listed below.
References
- Thomas K. Rymes (2006). "On National Income", Carleton University Working Paper (9 October)
- T. K. Rymes (2004). "Modern Central Banks Only Have Real Effects", Carleton University Working Paper
- René Durand and Thomas K. Rymes (2000). "On Capital and Productivity: Harrodian and Keynesian Measures", 26th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Cracow, Poland
- T. K. Rymes (2000). "On the Cambridge Correction to the Measurement of Productivity in Manufacturing" CSLS Conference on the Canada-U.S. Manufacturing Productivity Gap (21-22 January)
- Colin Rogers and T. K. Rymes (1998). "On 'Money' in ISLM and AD/AS Models", Carleton University Working Paper (February)
- Alexandra Cas and Thomas K. Rymes (1991). On Concepts and Measures of Multifactor Productivity in Canada, 1961-1980, Cambridge University Press
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment