Figure 1: Wage Curves In The Example |
I have presented this example before. This example is another case of exploring or demonstrating code written for Matlab or Octave.
The structure of the example is the minimum multi-industry example with circulating and fixed capital in all industries and in which the choice of technique is to select the economic life of a machine.
The recurrence of truncation is like the recurrence of a process in single production. As far as I know, no numeric example exists in the literature of the recurrence of truncation without reswitching. This example might have been surprising if I were writing half a century ago. Its possibility is obvious in the work of Bertram Shefold, Heinz Kurz & Neri Salvadori, Ian Steedman, and others. Although reswitching and capital-reversing do not arise in the example, the reverse substitution of labor does.
2.0 Technology and TechniquesTwo industries exist in the example. One industry produces machines, and the other industry produces corn. Corn is a consumption good, the good for circulating capital, and the numeraire. Machines are fixed capital. Each machine has a physical life of two years. Old machines cannot be transferred between industries. I assume constant returns to scale (CRS) and the free disposal of old machines. Labor is advanced and paid out of the surplus of corn.
Tables 1 and 2 show the inputs and outputs for each process known to the managers of firms. For example, the inputs, at a unit level of operation, consist of 1/10 person-years, 1/16 bushels corn, and one new machine. The outputs, available after a year, are two new machines and one machine a year older.
Input | Industry | |||
Machine | Corn | |||
I | II | III | IV | |
Labor | 1/10 | 8 | 43/40 | 1 |
Corn | 1/16 | 3/20 | 1/8 | 53/200 |
New Machines | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
One-Year Old Machines (1st type) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
One-Year Old Machines (2nd type) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Output | Industry | |||
Machine | Corn | |||
I | II | III | IV | |
Corn | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14/25 |
New Machines | 2 | 5/2 | 0 | 0 |
One-Year Old Machines (1st type) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
One-Year Old Machines (2nd type) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
The machines operate an non-constant efficiency in both industries. An old machine, in the machine industry, is used to produce more new machines than a new machine. The inputs of labor services and corn increase with the age of the machine. In the corn industry, an ole machine is used to produce less corn than a new machine. The input of labor services decrease and the corn input increases with the age of the machine.
With this specification of the technology, the economic life of the machine must be chosen in each industry. Table 3 lists the available techniques. The machine is truncated in both industries in the Alpha technique. The machine is operated for its full physical life in both industries in the Delta technique. In Beta and Gamma, the machine is truncated in one industry and operated for its full physical life in the other.
Technique | Processes |
Alpha | I, III |
Beta | I, II, III |
Gamma | I, III, IV |
Delta | I, II, III, IV |
The economic life of a machine is chosen to minimize cost. A system of equations for prices is associated with each technique. This system can be solved. In the solution, the wage is a function of the rate of profit. Each price of a produced commodity is also a function of the rate of profits.
Figure 1 shows the wage curves, for the four techniques in the example. The cost-minimizing technique at each wage or rate of profits is the technique with its wage curve on the outer frontier. The cost-minimizing techniques are indicated on the figure. Maybe I should experiment with perturbing parameters to see if I can get a more visually obvious graph. Figure 2 shows an enlargement, emphasizing rates of profits around the switch point between Gamma and Delta.
Figure 2: Wage Curves In The Example (Enlarged) |
At any rate, the cost-minimizing techniques, in order of an increasing rate of profits, are Alpha, Gamma, Delta, and Beta. Each pair of techniques at a switch point on the frontier differs in one process. A switch point in which the economic life of a machine differs in both industries would be a fluke case. No fluke switch points exist in this example, without perturbing some coefficients of production.
4.0 Prices of Old MachinesIdentifying when prices of old machines are negative provides another method of analyzing the choice of technique in models of pure fixed capital. A negative price indicates that the economic life of a machine should be shortened. The machine should be truncated and discarded.
Figure 3 plots the price of old machines in the machine industry, for the two techniques in which old machines are operated in this industry. The switch points, at which the price of an old machine is zero, are indicated. As can be seen in Figure 2, the switch point between Alpha and Beta is not on the outer frontier.
For rates of profits less than that at the switch point between Gamma and Delta, the price of an old machine in the machine industry is negative for the Delta price system. If the Delta technique were in operation, prices would signal that machines in the Delta industry should be truncated. This trunction results in the Gamma tecnique being adopted.
Figure 3: The Price of an Old Machine in Machine Production |
Figure 4 plots the price of old machines in the corn industry. Old machines are operated in this industry only for Beta and Delta. Since the price of these old machines are negative, in the Gamma price system, for rates of profits less than the rate at which the price is zero, the machine is truncated at these rates and the Alpha technique is adopted. Likewise, at rates of profits greater than the rate at which the price of this machine is zero, in the Delta system, the machine is truncated and the Beta technique is cost-minimizing at these rates.
Figure 4: The Price of an Old Machine in Corn Production |
This analysis of prices of old machines has re-justified the analysis of the choice of technique in Section 4.
5.0 Extra Profits in Extending the Economic Life of MachinesA third method of examining the choice of technique is available.
Under Alpha and Gamma, the machine is truncated in the machine industry. The price of an old machine in the machine industry is zero under those price systems. Figure 5 shows extra profits, for each technique, available in operating the machine for a second year. if the life of this type of machine is extended under Gamma, the Delta technique is adopted. Extra profits are available in so extending the life of the machine at any rate of profits greater than at the switch point between Gamma and Delta. Gamma cannot be cost-minimizing in this range.
Figure 5: Extra Profits in the Machine Industry |
The machine is truncated in the corn industry for Alpha and Beta. Figure 6 shows extra profits in the corn-industry, for all techniques, in operating the machine for a second year. Extra profits cannot be obtained for Alpha up to the switch point between Alpha and Gamma. Likewise, extra profits are not available for Beta, in extending the life of the machine in corn-production, for rates of profits greater than at the switch point between Beta and Delta. This method of analyzing the choice of technique, not surprisingly, yields the same result as the other two.
Figure 6: Extra Profits in the Machine Industry |
6.0 Recap
The above has illustrated three equivalent methods of analyzing the choice of technique for a pure fixed capital model. Table 4 summarizes the results for this numerical example. The bounds on the ranges of the rates of profits are approximate. Matlab has a funtion, roots(), that returns the (possibly complex) zeros for a polynomial of any degree. I use this function in finding the intersections of wage curves in this example.
Range | Technique | Truncation |
0 ≤ r ≤ 70.21% | Alpha | Machines truncated in both industries. |
70.21% ≤ r ≤ 71.19% | Gamma | Machines truncated in machine-production. |
71.19% ≤ r ≤ 87.5% | Delta | Machines operated at full physical life in both industries. |
87.5% ≤ r ≤ 122.8% | Beta | Machines truncated in corn-production. |
At any rate, the machine is truncated in corn-production when both the Alpha and the Beta technique are cost-minimizing. The truncation of the machine in corn-production recurs, being part of the cost-minimizing technique at extremes of low and high rates of profits. This is not, however, an example of the reswitching of techniques.
Negative real Wicksell effects occur at all four switch points. Around each switch point, a lower rate of profits and higher wage is associated with a greater net output of corn per person-year. At the switch point between Alpha and Gamma, truncation in the corn industry is a switch to a more capital-intensive technique. Likewise, at the switch point Gamma and Delta, truncation in the machine industry is a switch to a more capital-intensive technique. As usual, these results disagree with Austrian capital theory and the ideas of economists of this school about roundaboutness.
Around the switch point between Alpha and Gamma, a lower rate of profits or higher wage is associated with truncation in the corn industry and a greater gross output of corn per person-year hired in the corn industry. Around the switch point between Delta and Beta, contrawise, a lower rate of profits or higher wage is associated with the extension of the economic life of the machine in the corn industry and a decrease in the gross output of corn per person-year hired in the corn industry. This second switch point is a manifestation of the reverse substitution of labor, one of those 'perverse' phenomena found in the Cambridge capital controversy.
No comments:
Post a Comment