**1.0 Introduction**

In this post, I describe a theory of prices that is an alternative to the neoclassical supply-and-demand theory of prices as scarcity indices. In this exposition, I consider the simple case in which the modeled economy does not produce a surplus. In this simple case, prices of production are in the ratios of labor values and of commodity values, for any specified commodity. This post illustrates this claim too.

I do not draw the conclusion from the equivalence illustrated here that labor values have no priority over commodity values. After all, the formal model illustrated here does not include a principal agent problem arising with labor.

**2.0 Technology and Advanced Wages**

Consider a simple economy in which only three commodities are produced, namely, wheat, iron, and pigs. Each commodity is produced by a specified process requiring (possibly zero) inputs of labor, wheat, iron, and pigs. Suppose these processes are observed to produce the quantities of outputs shown in Table 1 from the inputs shown there. In other words, these processes are observed to operate at the scale shown. No assumption about returns to scale is made here. In particular, it is not necessary for Constant Returns to Scale to prevail.

INPUTS | WheatIndustry | IronIndustry | PigIndustry |

Labor | 1 Person-Year | 2 Person-Years | 3 Person-Years |

Wheat | 230 Quarters | 70 Quarters | 90 Quarters |

Iron | 12 Tons | 6 Tons | 3 Tons |

Pigs | 12 Pigs | 12 Pigs | |

OUTPUTS | 450 Quarters | 21 Tons | 60 Pigs |

Suppose wages are advanced at the start of the production period, and that these advanced wages consist of 10 quarters wheat and 6 pigs per person-year. Then one could specify the inputs to the production processes as consisting exclusively of wheat, iron, and pigs, with no labor input (as shown in Table 2). This is now the example from paragraph 2 of Sraffa's

*Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities*. Notice that the outputs can just replace the inputs, including the advanced wages, with no commodity surplus being left over. Capitalists do not make an accounting profit in this economy.

INPUTS | WheatIndustry | IronIndustry | PigIndustry |

Wheat | 240 Quarters | 90 Quarters | 120 Quarters |

Iron | 12 Tons | 6 Tons | 3 Tons |

Pigs | 18 Pigs | 12 Pigs | 30 Pigs |

OUTPUTS | 450 Quarters | 21 Tons | 60 Pigs |

**3.0 Prices of Production**

With the social division of labor in this economy, firms in each industry at the end of the production period have an inventory of a single commodity. To continue production, they must trade some of that commodity for the other commodities they need as inputs. Prices of (re)production are time-invariant prices that allow these trades to occur and the economy to be smoothly reproduced through the actions of the agents in the economy. For this simple example, prices of production must satisfy three equations:

240p_{w}+ 12p_{i}+ 18p_{p}= 450p_{w}

90p_{w}+ 6p_{i}+ 12p_{p}= 21p_{i}

120where:p_{w}+ 3p_{i}+ 30p_{p}= 60p_{p}

*p*_{w}is the price of a quarter of wheat,*p*_{i}is the price of a ton of iron, and*p*_{p}is the price of a pig.

These equations are linearly dependent. Any multiple of a solution set of prices is also a solution. I arbitrarily pick a quarter of wheat as the numeraire. The solution set of prices is then $1 per quarter wheat, $10 per ton iron, and $5 per pig.

**4.0 Labor Values**

One can work out a consistent accounting in which the amount of labor time embodied in each commodity is measured. Labor values are found as the solution to the following system of three linear inhomogeneous equations in three unknowns:

1 + 230v_{w}+ 12v_{i}+ 12v_{p}= 450v_{w}

2 + 70v_{w}+ 6v_{i}= 21v_{i}

3 + 90where:v_{w}+ 3v_{i}+ 12v_{p}= 60v_{p}

*v*_{w}is the person-years labor embodied in a quarter of wheat,*v*_{i}is the person-years labor embodied in a ton of iron, and*v*_{p}is the person-years labor embodied in a pig.

**5.0 Wheat Values**

One can also work out a consistent accounting system in which the amount of wheat embodied in each commodity is measured. Wheat values for iron and pigs are found as the solution to the following system of two linear inhomogeneous equations in two unknowns:

90 + 6w_{i}+ 12w_{p}= 21w_{i}

120 + 3where:w_{i}+ 30w_{p}= 60w_{p}

*w*_{i}is the quarters wheat embodied in a ton of iron and*w*_{p}is the quarters wheat embodied in a pig.

*w*

_{i}= 10 quarters per ton and

*w*

_{p}= 5 quarters per pig.

Calculating iron values for wheat and pigs and calculating pig values for wheat and iron are left as an exercise to the reader.

**6.0 Contrast and Comparison**

For any set of values (prices of production, labor values, or commodity values), one can find quantities of each commodities that are valued as equal for that set. Table 3 illustrates by showing the values of specified quantities of each commodity. In this example, the following equation holds:

10 quarters wheat = 1 ton iron = 2 pigs,whether commodities are valued in terms of dollars, embodied labor, or any commodity value (such as wheat). The equivalence of all these values is a special case. This equivalence works out from considering a pure circulating capital case in which an economic surplus not paid out in wages is not produced.

Quantities | Value in | ||

Prices ofProduction | Person-Years ofEmbodied Labor | Quarters ofEmbodied Wheat | |

10 Quarters Wheat | $10 | 1/4 Person-Years | 10 Quarters |

1 Ton Iron | $10 | 1/4 Person-Years | 10 Quarters |

2 Pigs | $10 | 1/4 Person-Years | 10 Quarters |

## 1 comment:

I believe it was Brody in his 1970 "Proportions, Prices and Planning" who first made your point. But we can go further back to Ricardo and his struggles with the problem of an invariable measure of value. Ricardo realized that if one real-cost measure could serve as an absolute measure of value then *any* real-cost measure could (see his last essay, "Absolute value and exchangeable value", which was rediscovered intact while Sraffa was compiling his collected works). Some authors, for example, Herbert Gintis, employ this fact to reject the LTV (which indicates how difficult it can be for a neoclassical-trained economist to actually get to grips with the classical labor theory of value). But, anyhow, what does your example demonstrate? -- I'd suggest it shows that -- even when `profits on stock' are absent, and prices are proportional to labor-values -- a static, linear production theory approach to the theory of economic value is inherently limited, precisely because it gives no guidance regarding the relationship between monetary magnitudes and their reference to (or lack of) real magnitudes, such as labor time. Could we deduce that a thermometer measures temperature from a photograph of it?

-Ian.

Post a Comment