12 years ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
My Blog List
-
-
3 days ago
-
11 years ago
-
13 years ago
-
16 hours ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
2 months ago
-
1 day ago
-
6 years ago
-
2 years ago
-
-
9 years ago
-
11 years ago
-
6 days ago
-
-
-
9 months ago
-
23 hours ago
-
-
7 years ago
-
3 years ago
-
16 years ago
-
6 years ago
-
-
4 years ago
-
16 years ago
-
-
3 weeks ago
-
10 years ago
-
9 years ago
-
-
-
13 years ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 years ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 year ago
-
-
8 years ago
-
7 years ago
-
13 years ago
-
3 years ago
-
2 days ago
-
7 years ago
-
3 years ago
-
3 days ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 week ago
-
10 years ago
-
3 years ago
-
2 years ago
-
5 months ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 years ago
-
7 hours ago
-
2 months ago
-
1 week ago
-
13 years ago
-
-
3 months ago
-
-
1 year ago
-
7 years ago
-
3 days ago
-
6 years ago
-
-
10 years ago
-
5 years ago
-
1 year ago
-
-
5 weeks ago
-
2 years ago
4 comments:
Sheesh, while we're at it, who's the most notable critic of the flat Earth hypothesis?
Now that is funny. The awesome power of Yahoo ASK at work.
But consider the company ... Paul Krugman, and Bryan Caplan from George Mason who posted something about why neoclassical economics is better (I'm not sure that neoclassical true believers need to answer this particular question anywhere except George Mason).
I don't think the flat earth hypothesis has quite the same influence. No candidate for president advocated it last year, and you don't find think tanks pushing it.
Bruce, I'm amused too. At least my references will point people to such critics as Paul Davidson.
Seems that the critics have still to understand the theory
Miracles of keynesism: getting rid of any rationality
Post a Comment