A couple of months ago, I read Anthony Trollope's novel, The Way We Live Now. Even though the novel was written and
set in England in 1870, I consider this post to be about contemporary American politics.
Are any of the characters in the novel sympathetic? Maybe Lady Carbury, to a certain extent, and her cousin Roger Carbury.
But I want to focus on Augustus Melmotte.
Melmotte is successful in business, but is initially considered vulgar by elite socialites in London. His business
success seems to be mostly a matter of a succession of cons, with a lot of juggling of accounts and debts, which
he tries to avoid paying. For example, in the past he has driven a company into bankruptcy with he himself
ending up with the bulk of what the stockholders had invested. (Unlike a contemporary analogue, he starts out
without an inherited fortune; Melmotte is self-made.)
Melmotte decides that even though he knows nothing about what politicians are arguing about,
he should run for office. In his case, he campaigns to become a Member of Parliament.
Somewhat arbitrarily, he decides he is a Tory.
But there was still much to be done in London before the Goodwood week should come round in all of which Mr. Melmotte was concerned,
and of much of which Mr. Melmotte was the very centre. A member for Westminster had succeeded to a peerage, and
thus a seat was vacated. It was considered to be indispensable to the country that Mr. Melmotte should go into Parliament,
and what constituency could such a man as Melmotte so fitly represent as one combining as Westminster does all the
essences of the metropolis? There was the popular element, the fashionable element, the legislative element,
the legal element, and the commercial element. Melmotte undoubtedly was the man for Westminster.
His thorough popularity was evinced by testimony which perhaps was never before given in favour of any candidate for
any county or borough. In Westminster there must of course be a contest.
A seat for Westminster is a thing not to be abandoned by either political party without a struggle.
But, at the beginning of the affair, when each party had to seek the most suitable candidate which the country could supply,
each party put its hand upon Melmotte. And when the seat, and the battle for the seat, were suggested to Melmotte,
then for the first time was that great man forced to descend from the altitudes on which his mind generally dwelt,
and to decide whether he would enter Parliament as a Conservative or a Liberal.
He was not long in convincing himself that the Conservative element in British Society stood the most in need of
that fiscal assistance which it would be in his province to give; and on the next day every hoarding in London
declared to the world that Melmotte was the Conservative candidate for Westminster.
It is needless to say that his committee was made up of peers, bankers, and publicans,
with all that absence of class prejudice for which the party has become famous since the ballot was introduced among us.
Some unfortunate Liberal was to be made to run against him, for the sake of the party;
but the odds were ten to one on Melmotte.
Melmotte can find
some to recognize his qualifications.
The new farthing newspaper, "The Mob," was already putting Melmotte forward as a
political hero, preaching with reference to his commercial transactions the
grand doctrine that magnitude in affairs is a valid defense for certain
irregularities.
He cannot campaign on issues, since he knows nothing about them.
There was one man who thoroughly believed that the thing at the present moment most essentially
necessary to England's glory was the return of Mr. Melmotte for Westminster.
This man was undoubtedly a very ignorant man.
He knew nothing of any one political question which had vexed England for the last half
century,—nothing whatever of the political history which had made England what it was at the
beginning of that half century. Of such names as Hampden, Somers, and Pitt he had hardly ever heard.
He had probably never read a book in his life.
He knew nothing of the working of parliament, nothing of nationality,—had no preference whatever for one form of
government over another, never having given his mind a moment's trouble on the subject.
He had not even reflected how a despotic monarch or a federal republic might affect himself,
and possibly did not comprehend the meaning of those terms.
But yet he was fully confident that England did demand and ought to demand that Mr. Melmotte should be returned for Westminster.
This man was Mr. Melmotte himself.
His campaign
is mostly petty personalities. The discourse in the press is just as
elevated:
Now the "Evening Pulpit," in its endeavor to make the facts of this
transaction known, had placed what it called the domicile of this
company in Paris, whereas it was ascertained that its official head-quarters
had in truth been placed at Vienna. Was not such a blunder as this sufficient
to show that no merchant of higher honor than Mr. Melmotte had ever
adorned the Exchanges of modern capitals? And then two different newspapers
of the time, both of them antagonistic to Melmotte, failed to be in
accord on a material point. One declared that Mr. Melmotte was not
in truth possessed of any wealth. The other said that he had
derived his wealth from those unfortunate shareholders. Could
anything betray so bad a cause as contradictions such as these? Could
anything be so false, so weak, so malignant, so useless, so wicked,
so self-condemned, - in fact, so "Liberal" as a course of action such
as this? The belief naturally to be deduced from such statements,
nay, the unavoidable conviction on the minds - of, at any rate, the
Conservative newspapers - was that Mr. Melmotte had accumulated
an immense fortune, and that he had never robbed any shareholder
of a shilling.
He continues in his ignorance after he gets elected. He
neither understands nor wants to know the conventions
governing parliamentary debate. He does not address the
chair, nor refer to his fellow members as "the honorary
member from" wherever. Instead, all he can do is blurt
out, "He's wrong", in dealing with the previous speaker.
He stands up because of some petty dislike. But Trollope
says that, in this case, Melmotte actually knows something
about the topic, it being foreign exchange rates. But
Melmotte is almost completely inarticulate.
He continues his business. He had hoped that his political
eminence would contribute towards his financial interests.
On the contrary, it leads to exposure of his shenanigans:
How would things go with him? What would be the end if it? - Ruin; - yes
but there were worse things than ruins. And a short time since he had
been so fortunate; - had made himself so safe! As he looked back at it,
he could hardly say how it had come to pass that he had laid down for
himself. He had known that ruin would come, and had made himself so
comfortably safe, so brilliantly safe, in spite of ruin. But
insane ambition had driven himself away from his anchorage.
He told himself over and over again that the fault had been not
in circumstances - not in that which men call Fortune, -
but in his own incapacity to bear his position. He saw it now.
He felt it now. If he could only begin again, how different
would his conduct be!
Posts
