I have written about so-called factor price curves and frontiers in many posts. They are so-called because the interest rate is not a price of any factor of production. In this post, I use the more neutral expressions "Wage-Rate of Profits Curve" and "Wage-Rate of Profits Frontier". I consider the concepts denoted by these terms to be elements of mathematical economics that arise, in particular, in the analysis of steady states.
2.0 Derivation of a Wage-Rate of Profits Curve
Consider an economy in which n commodities are produced. Each commodity j is produced in a corresponding industry in which it is the sole output of a single process. This process:
- Requires inputs of labor and commodities. These inputs are represented as a0, j person-years per unit output and ai, j units of the ith commodity per unit output.
- Exhibits Constant Returns to Scale (CRS).
- Requires a year to complete.
- Totally uses up its commodity inputs.
- Each commodity enters either directly or indirectly into the production of all commodities. That is, all commodities are basic in the sense of Sraffa.
- The economy is viable. That is, there exists a level of operation of all processes such that the outputs can replace the commodities used up in their production and leave a surplus product to be paid out in the form of wages and profits.
- Wages are paid at the end of the year.
- The same rate of profits is earned on advances in all industries.
Under these assumptions, the constant prices that allow the economy to smoothly reproduce satisfy the following system of n equations:
p A (1 + r) +w a0 = pwhere p is the row vector of prices, w is the wage, and r is the rate of profits. Given the rate of profits, this is a linear system in n + 1 variables. The last equation imposed in the model sets the value of the numeraire to unity:
p e = 1where e is a column vector denoting the units of each commodity that comprise the numeraire. Only solutions in which all prices are positive and the wage is non-negative are considered.
The price equation can be transformed into:
w a0 = p [I - (1 + r)A]where I is the identity matrix. Or:
w a0 [I - (1 + r)A]-1 = pwhere the assumption of viability guarantees the existence of the inverse for all rates of profits between zero and a maximum rate of profits. Right multiply both sides of the above equation by the numeraire:
w a0 [I - (1 + r)A]-1 e = p e = 1The wage-rate of profits curve for the technique is then:
w = 1/{a0 [I - (1 + r)A]-1 e}
3.0 Properties of Wage-Rate of Profits Curves
The Wage-Rate of Profits Curve for a technique, under the assumptions above, has the following properties:
- There is a finite maximum rate of profits for which the wage is zero. (If no commodity were basic, this maximum would not be finite.)
- There is a maximum wage for which the rate of profits is zero.
- The wage-rate of profits curve is strictly decreasing between the rate of profits of zero and the maximum rate of profits.
- The wage rate of profits curve can be both convex to the origin and concave to the origin. (If the number of commodities n is greater than 2, the convexity can vary throughout the curve.)
- If the vector of direct labor coeffients is a left-hand eigenvector of the Leontief Input-Output matrix, the wage-rate of profits curve is a straight line, that is, affine. (This is Marx's case of equal organic composition of capitals.)
- If the numeraire is a right-hand eigenvector of the Leontief Input-Output matrix, the wage-rate of profits curve is affine. (This is the case of Sraffa's standard commodity.)
Figure 1: The Frontier Formed From Factor-Price Curves (from Pasinetti (1977), p. 157) |
Selected References
- Heinz D. Kurz and Neri Salvadori (1995) Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis, Cambridge University Press
- Heinz D. Kurz and Neri Salvadori "Production Theory: An Introduction"
- Luigi L. Pasinetti (1977) Lectures on the Theory of Production, Columbia University Press
4 comments:
You say that the interest rate is not a price of any factor of production. I agree that profit (or loss) is not such a price. But the interest rate, especially in simple models of the Sraffian kind, can be considered to be the rental price of money-capital, i.e. if r is the interest rate then it costs 1r dollars to borrow 1 dollar of money-capital during the production period. Certainly money-capital is not a physical factor of production, but it is a social factor, in the sense that in a capitalist economy firms are advanced money-capital to buy input commodities by a capitalist class. And this advance and rental charge is a source of income for that class.
I agree that the rate of profits in this model is the rental price of money-capital, perhaps with a risk premium. "Profits" in this model refers to accounting profits, not pure economic profits.
I think you'll find Chapter 21 of Bidard's "Prices, Reproduction, Scarcity" of interest with respect to the capital controversies.
Merry Christmas, Ian. Chapter 21 happens to be my most-reread chapter in that book. I believe I've made most of Bidard's valid points on this blog, many before I first read his book. Kurz and Salvadori have some criticisms. I concur that Bidard misunderstands Garegnani's numerical example and doesn't clearly explain what he means by the "differentiability hypothesis".
Post a Comment